Expert historical and scientific analysis for climate and environmental litigation

Grenville Science brings together historians of science, scientists, and journalists who study what industries knew about the hazards of their products, when they knew it, and how they shaped the science. Its members have testified at trial and before the U.S. Congress, and have written amicus briefs filed in the Supreme Court and the federal courts of appeals.

People

  • Portrait of Naomi Oreskes

    Naomi Oreskes

    Harvard University

    Henry Charles Lea Professor of the History of Science and Affiliated Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences. A geologist by training and author of Merchants of Doubt, she has testified before the U.S. Congress ten times and served as an expert witness at trial.

    Full biography

    Naomi Oreskes is the Henry Charles Lea Professor of the History of Science and Affiliated Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences at Harvard University. She is an internationally renowned earth scientist, historian, author, and public intellectual.

    She received a BSc in mining geology from the Royal School of Mines at Imperial College London and an interdisciplinary PhD in geological research and the history of science from Stanford University. She worked as an exploration geologist in the Australian outback and spent fifteen years at the University of California, San Diego, before joining the Harvard faculty in 2013. Her books on the history of earth and environmental science include the best-selling Merchants of Doubt (2010), made into a documentary film by Participant Media, and Science on a Mission: How Military Funding Shaped What We Do and Don’t Know about the Ocean (2021), awarded the Suppes Prize by the American Philosophical Society.

    She is widely recognized for her work on the history of earth science, the development of the scientific consensus on climate change, and the history of corporate resistance and deception related to the reality and impacts of climate change. Her honors include fellowship in the American Geophysical Union, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences; a 2018 Guggenheim Fellowship; the 2019 British Academy Medal; the 2024 Nonino Foundation “Master of Our Time” prize; and the 2025 Volvo Environment Prize. Her publications have been cited more than 45,900 times and translated into more than a dozen languages, and her 2014 TED talk, “Why We Should Trust Scientists,” has been viewed more than 1.7 million times.

    She has served as an expert witness in several cases, has testified before the U.S. Congress on ten occasions, and has been an author or signatory of ten amicus curiae briefs.

  • Portrait of Nina Elkadi

    Nina Elkadi

    University of Iowa

    Journalist covering agriculture, climate, and corporate influence on science, with work in Politico Magazine, National Geographic, and Inside Climate News. A Harvard graduate in the history of science, she wrote her senior thesis on what American farmers knew about the harms of DDT. She is an Iowa Arts Fellow in the University of Iowa’s Nonfiction Writing Program.

  • Portrait of Alexander Kaurov

    Alexander Kaurov

    Blue Marble Space

    An astrophysicist by training (PhD, University of Chicago; Institute for Advanced Study), now a PhD candidate in Science in Society at Victoria University of Wellington. He uses computational methods to trace industry influence on regulatory science. Co-editor of Reckoning Science.

  • Colleen Lanier‑Christensen

    Harvard University

    Historian of science and environmental health. Her research traces how chemical toxicity-testing standards were made, from the 1970s to the present, and who shaped them. She holds a PhD in the History of Science from Harvard, where she is a postdoctoral fellow, and an MPH from Columbia’s Mailman School of Public Health.

Cases & expert testimony

Expert witness at trial

  1. Mann v. National Review, Inc., et al.

  2. Eastman Chemical Co. v. PlastiPure, Inc. and CertiChem, Inc.

U.S. Congress Hearings, briefings & forums

  1. “Dollars and Degrees: Investigating Fossil Fuel Dark Money’s Systemic Threats to Climate and the Federal Budget”

  2. “Climate Disinformation and Online Transparency”

  3. “Dark Money and Barriers to Climate Action”

  4. “Examining the Oil Industry’s Efforts to Suppress the Truth about Climate Change”

  5. “Climate Science: Assumptions, Policy Implications, and the Scientific Method”

  6. Senate Democratic Policy and Communications Center

  7. Forum on the Fossil Fuel Industry Disinformation Campaign

  8. “Zero Accountability: The Consequences of Politically Driven Science”

  9. Bicameral Task Force on Climate Change

  10. “Examining Climate Change and the Media”

Other legislative & regulatory testimony

  1. Special Committee on Climate Change and Sustainable Development

  2. “Developing a Repository Safety Strategy with Special Attention to Model Validation”

Amicus briefs

Briefs of amici curiae Authored or signed by Naomi Oreskes

  1. Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County

  2. Monsanto Co. v. Durnell

  3. State of Delaware v. BP America Inc., et al.

  4. City and County of Honolulu v. Sunoco LP, et al.

  5. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. BP p.l.c., et al.

  6. State of Minnesota v. American Petroleum Institute, et al.

  7. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. BP p.l.c., et al.

  8. City of Oakland and City and County of San Francisco v. BP p.l.c., et al.

  9. County of San Mateo, et al. v. Chevron Corp., et al.

Publications

Selected academic publications

  1. From agricultural chemistry to toxicology: the AOAC and the politics of validation

  2. The afterlife of a ghost-written paper: How corporate authorship shaped two decades of glyphosate safety discourse

  3. Climate Change and the Clean Air Act of 1970, Part I: The Scientific Basis

  4. Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections

  5. Creating Regulatory Harmony: The Participatory Politics of OECD Chemical Testing Standards in the Making

  6. Assessing ExxonMobil’s climate change communications (1977–2014)

Books

  1. The Big Myth: How American Business Taught Us to Loathe Government and Love the Free Market

  2. Science on a Mission: How Military Funding Shaped What We Do and Don’t Know about the Ocean

  3. Why Trust Science?

  4. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming

Essays & reporting

  1. “Cancer Doesn’t Care What Party You Belong To”: Poisoned Water Is Turning This Rural State Bluer

  2. Imported Science: How Compromised American Science Underwrites New Zealand’s Regulation

  3. Managing the Pitfalls of Private Money

  4. Of Mice and Men and Round Numbers

  5. The Editorial that Defends a Ghostwritten Paper by Citing Additional Ghostwritten Papers

  6. Private Money Cannot Replace Public Funding of Science

  7. Cleaning the Scientific House: Rebuilding Trust in Science Requires Confronting the Harms of Ghostwriting

  8. The Impact of a Ghostwritten Paper on the Fate of Glyphosate

  9. The Beef Industry Knew Its Climate Impact as Early as 1989—and Worked to Obfuscate the Science

Video

Congressional testimony Her testimony and exchanges with members, edited from the full hearings

Senate Committee on the Budget“Dollars and Degrees” · June 21, 2023 · 24 min
Senate Democrats’ Special Committee on the Climate Crisis“Dark Money and Barriers to Climate Action” · October 29, 2019 · 23 min
House Committee on Natural Resources“Zero Accountability” · April 29, 2015 · 13 min

Other video

Climate Change Denial and Misinformation in the Oil Industry
Unveiling Tobacco Industry Deception Through Internal Documents
Climate Crisis: Urgent Government Action Needed to Prevent Disaster

Contact

For enquiries, email contact@grenvillescience.com.